Vanguard: SMSFs: Costs versus performance
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 3:35pm
Robin Bowerman
Fri, 24 May 2013 5:05pm
Smart Investing with Robin Bowerman
Robin Bowerman
Wed, 22 May 2013 4:10pm
Smart Investing with Robin Bowerman
Robin Bowerman
Fri, 17 May 2013 5:10pm
Smart Investing with Robin Bowerman
Robin Bowerman
Fri, 17 May 2013 5:05pm
Smart Investing with Robin Bowerman
Robin Bowerman
Thu, 16 May 2013 5:40pm
Smart Investing with Robin Bowerman
Robin Bowerman
Wed, 15 May 2013 12:00pm
Smart Investing with Robin Bowerman
Robin Bowerman
Fri, 10 May 2013 4:55pm
Smart Investing with Robin Bowerman
Robin Bowerman
Fri, 10 May 2013 4:20pm
Smart Investing with Robin Bowerman
Robin Bowerman
Fri, 3 May 2013 3:40pm
Smart Investing with Robin Bowerman
Robin Bowerman
Fri, 3 May 2013 3:35pm
Smart Investing with Robin Bowerman
Icon_lastIcon_nextIcon_previousIcon_first

 

Thank you for downloading the Smart Investing podcast from index fund manager Vanguard Investments Australia, on the web at vanguard.com.au

 

This commentary is written by Vanguard Principal, Corporate Affairs & Market Development Robin Bowerman. The title is SMSFs: Costs versus performance

 

It was first published on Tuesday 24 April 2012

 

And is read by Michael Mullins

 

Please remember that advice in this podcast represents a general view. It is recommended that you seek specific financial advice, before making investment decisions.

 

One of the most interesting findings in a new tax office report – Self-Managed Superannuation Funds – A Statistical Overview – is that the bigger the balance, the better the performance during the financial years examined.

 

This finding is perhaps not surprising given that larger SMSFs typically have markedly lower costs - as a proportion of their assets – than their smaller counterparts. And larger SMSFs can afford to spend more on professional financial planning and tax advice.

 

Smart Investing initially looked at this ATO report last week (Inside story on SMSFs and SMSFs winning on cost control ).

 

Based on SMSF tax and regulatory returns, the ATO estimates that in 2009-10, the average rate of return for SMSFs according to asset size was:

 

Up to $50,000 in assets: -8.64 per cent.

$50,000-$100,000 in assets: -1.48 per cent.

$100,000-$200,000 in assets: 2.46 per cent.

$200,000-$500,000 in assets: 5.23 per cent.

$500,000-$1 million in assets: 6.87 per cent.

$1 million-$2 million in assets: 7.71 per cent.

Above $2 million: 8.90 per cent in assets.

 

These returns should reinforce to anyone considering whether to setup an SMSF that asset size and costs really influence the feasibility of having your own fund. (The cost issue was discussed by Smart Investing in last week’s blogs mentioned above.)

 

And that concludes the column

 

SMSFs: Costs versus performance

 

from Robin Bowerman,  Principal, Corporate Affairs & Market Development at index fund manager Vanguard Investments Australia

 

To receive the column by email each week go to vanguard.com.au and register with Smart Investing. 

 

Please remember that advice in this podcast represents a general view. It is recommended that you seek specific financial advice, before making investment decisions.